No accusation was made other than the 55/1.8 does not Autofocus slowly. There is no doubt for general low light work or sport this camera is going to be a killer, but what about longer exposures At 30 seconds the A7RII is holding it’s own, but starting to loose the edge it had at 1 second, and by 5 minutes significant noise has. in any case I’ve never experienced issues with SLR lenses but to each their own. The A7RII’s sensor behaviour is a very clear example of why this test is important. Only the newest ones do but it’s possible that performance is improved. A7rii flickr gallery manual#I care about people actually using lenses and providing their actual constructive experiences/critiques of performance in actual use in defined situations of the original post - for instance did the Autofocus speed make you miss an actual shot, was this a paid job, or did it work? Also for manual lenses with Nikon they don’t autofocus. so the point is that I don’t care about a thread on FM. I’ve seen the 40 and tested the 18 and 135. I don’t own the 24/2.8 and probably never will because it doesn’t interest me.Īs for the Batis lenses I own the 85 and owned the 25. I owned the 35/2.8 (sold it) and I still own the 55. Really my only major gripes (that haven’t been addressed in the subsequent model) is that the ergonomics (without the grip) could be improved when using the larger lens options (for instance allow the body size to grow on a future model to be close in size to the Fujifilm XH1 as this seems to be what the new Panasonic LUMIX S line is sized around) and I’d like the option of having additional aspect ratios in camera.Ĭlick to expand.Lets see. So I'll just wait for the next major leap. If the sensor was higher resolution or had a major bump in dynamic range, then it would have been worth upgrading. IMO, there is not enough difference between the two to justify the upgrade. The a7rii was such a good camera when released, it still shines today. I haven’t seen any major focusing issues with the A7RII and I will say my keeper and in focus rate is very high when used for weddings. The a7riii is a fine camera, but expensive. Even still the 55/1.8 is worth considering too and paired with the 28/2 (or 24GM) it makes a pretty light Autofocus combination. it’ll cost you slightly more than a A7III body only and if you shop used you may find the 50 Loxia in the $500-700 range depending on condition. there are a handful of great gems in the Sony G and third party lineups too from Voigtlander, Tamron, etc. In any case though I think most people would be happy with the performance of the Loxia, Batis, Sony Zeiss, or G-Master lenses. There are enough great options now to cover the needs of most with a few obvious gaps and omissions that will likely come in the future. Sony A7 / A7R / A7S / A7II / A7RII / A7SII / A7III / A7RIII Comm. Otherwise I generally suggest going native. Flickr photos, groups, and tags related to the Sony A7II Flickr tag. Click to expand.With adapting I generally only recommend doing so if you’re using vintage lenses for a particular look.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |